|
With
an eye toward cleaning up details in the paperwork handed
in for the Widewaters shopping center proposal, the Planning
Board recently reviewed some required site plan changes.
Some of what Jim Green, the Planning Board's special engineer,
found during his review of the site plan for the center,
to be located at the intersection of Route 9, 9H, and State
Farm Road, was that details agreed to by the applicant --
some written on previous plans and some that were omitted
had to be on the most recent plan for the project lest they
be forgotten and potentially skipped. Green read a list
of plan updates that he advised the board should be certain
are on the final site plan for Widewaters.
Green
started his presentation by noting that there was a discrepancy
in what the Planning Board expected and what the:applicant
wrote for cross access. This access -- a matter that the
applicant was not in favor of -- was to be included to provide
a place for neighboring parcels to connect if they were
developed. The correct wording was found elsewhere in the
record on this project, and it appeared it was just a matter
of having the site plan updated to reflect it.
The
most heated exchange of the evening was about whether Widewaters
would agree to set aside a conservation easement for a section
of property in the southwestern corner dubbed "forever wild."
Planning Board Chairman Ed Simonsen requested that language
on the plan notes read that "no additional buildings/structures
or building additions shall be added to this site:"
Widewaters
representative Marco Marzocchi said he felt that language
was restrictive on future development enough, but the board
noted that anyone could request a site plan amendment in
the future, which could allow for more development at this
location.
A conservation easement would lock a section of undeveloped
land as permanently undevelopable. Marzocchi said he would
refuse to alIow a conservation easement because some unforeseen
future event may require additional construction in that
area. He said currently, as designed, the Planning Board
would have to review any new structure on that area anyway.
Marzocchi
also said he felt the board was "holding him over a barrel"
on this matter, and that it was late in the game to be making
such a request.
Most
of the other issues were deemed less worrisome by Green.
He said there's no drainage shown on the plans for the proposed
roundabout -- the remediation plan designed to handle traffic
concerns created by the addition of the center to this already
busy intersection. The board believed that the water wbuld
likely continue to drain as it does now.
Green
said he questioned whether a generator for the proposed
Hannaford's Bros. grocery store could be moved to a space
blocked by a berm, so noise from its use would be less noticeable
to neighbors. Marzocchi said it had to be where it was designed
to coincide with mechanics inside the building.
Green
noted that the plans incorporate 20-foot tall trees along
the western edge of the proposal. He said the trees would
likely block the view of the Catskill mountains, which was
a concern listed by some opponents to this project. On the
other hand, the trees act as a screening buffer for neighbors.
Marzocchi said Widewaters would agree to trim the trees
to maintain the view.
After
being questioned by Green on low light levels, Marzocchi
produced an updated light output chart for a dark area between
a proposed restaurant at the site and the northern property
line. The new numbers showed the area was brighter than
initially calculated.
The
board questioned what the proposed pump house would look
like, because the developer had yet to provide designs for
the building. Marzocchi told the board it would look similar
to the other buildings that had board final plan.approval,
and would be made the same types of materials. The board
requested addtions to the site plan that include diagrams
with dimensions for the building and clear images on how
the buildings were supposed to look.Widewaters had such
plams, available, but they were not included in the site
plan. Marzocchi said they would included in the final packet.
Benches
and sidewalks the western end of the property were not drawn
on the slte plan.Green
advised the board to make certain they appear on the final
plan.
|
AREA
NEWSPAPER
CONTACT INFORMATION
ULSTER/ DUTCHESS
Poughkeepsie
Journal
PO Box 1231
Poughkeepsie, NY 12602
(845) 454-2000
For an
on line letter to the editor. Fill out this
form
Daily
Freeman
79 Hurley Avenue Kingston, NY 12401
Phone 331-5000 email your letter (SUBJECT : Letters to the
editor) publisher@freemanonline.com
FAX your letter 338-0672
ULSTER
COUNTY
Saugerties
Times
Monday deadline
P.O.Box
Phone:334- 8200
FAX your letter 334-8202
saugertiestimes@ulsterpublishing
(Attention Erica Freudenberger, editor)
P.O.Box 3329
Kingston, NY 12402
Woodstock
Times
Monday deadline
P.O.Box
Phone:334- 8200
FAX 334-8202
saugertiestimes@ulsterpublishing
(Attention Brian Hollander, editor)
P.O.Box 3329
Kingston, NY 12402 Saugerties
Post Star
141 Ulster Avenue
Saugerties, NY 12477 Phone
246-4985
FAX 246-5108 poststar@hvc.rr.com
ALBANY
Albany
Times Union
Times Union
90 State Street
Albany, NY 12207
(518) 454-5091
For an
on line letter to the editor. Fill out this
form
COLUMBIA
COUNTY
The Independent
Indenews
(online)
P.O. Box 360
Hillsdale, NY 12529
Phone (518) 325-4400
FAX (518) 325-4497
Parry Teasdale, editor
letters to editor require form through website
***NOTE:
Our websites make an effort
to glean info for our readers from local papers. This is
no way a substitute for subscribing or picking up a local
paper. We gratefully acknowledge the efforts local newspapers
and publications make to our community.
|