In a stunning turn of events, Saugerties town supervisor
Greg Helsmoortel and Saugerties village mayor Robert Yerick
announced on Tuesday that they both plan to introduce resolutions
to their respective boards in the coming weeks opposing
the siting of an Indian-run gambling casino at the 840-acre
Winston Farm.
Speaking as part of a panel on the topic that was convened
and moderated by Saugerties journalist C.J. Mellor and taped
for future airing over the town's public access channel,
Helsmoortel said that after reviewing considerable information
and visiting the Foxwoods Casino (which is run by the Mashantucket
Pequot tribe) several weeks ago, he has come to believe
a Class III, Las Vegas-style casino like the one being proposed
for his town "will change the fabric of our community."
Yerick said he has been gathering as much information as
possible so the village board can make an informed decision
and, as a result of his research, has turned "very
much against" the casino plan, calling it a "cancer."
Said the mayor, "It's not something we want to embrace
from a community point of view ... They are talking about
a million gallons of water a day. We have that, but I am
not willing to give it to a casino and [limit] all the other
projects in town. We are a quaint, historic, beautiful village
and we don't fit the agenda or design of a casino."
Yerick said he is even more concerned about the impact of
the operation's wastewater and potential for polluting the
aquifers at Winston Farm. "We could be putting the
water there in serious jeopardy," he said. "Once
they [the tribe and developer] get a foot in the door, if
we have water problems, wastewater problems or school problems,
they are not going to resolve them."
The mayor was also alarmed to learn that it appears the
federal Bureau of Indian Affairs and not the town would
be the lead agency for a SEQRA (State Environmental Quality
Review Act) review. (This matter could not be verified in
time for this week's issue.)
WILL
TOWN BOARD BACK HELSMOORTEL'S STANCE?
Helsmoortel may have the two additional votes he needs to
carry his resolution. Councilwoman Leeanne Thornton said
on Tuesday evening that she will second the supervisor's
resolution because she is concerned the casino would have
a negative impact on the town's water supplies, sewer service,
roads and traffic, schools and affordable housing. Councilman
Fred Costello Jr. said Wednesday that he hasn't "taken
a position for or against yet" but noted, "As
the proposal now stands, I wouldn't support it." Costello
said the town would need to receive more financial benefits
than it now appears it would get - the Seneca-Cayugas have
discussed a $15 million per year payment to the county that
the town could then possibly receive a share of - and he
said the tribe would have to abide by town laws and zoning
on its sovereign lands, which is unlikely. The casino-related
development would be situated on lands deemed to be so-called
"trust" lands that are considered sovereign and
not subject to most federal, state and local laws other
than criminal statutes once the casino is built and operating.
The Saugerties town board's remaining councilmen, Thomas
Macarille and Phil Tucker, both said this week that they
do not have enough information about the casino proposal
yet to take a position. Macarille said the casino-related
telephone calls he has been receiving from town residents
are running two-to-one against the casino, but Tucker noted
that the calls he is getting are more evenly split, possibly
even favoring a casino. Both board members said they would
favor a townwide referendum on the issue before they vote
on a resolution either favoring or opposing a casino.
WHAT
ALL THE FUSS IS ABOUT
The Seneca-Cayuga tribe is proposing to build just under
four million square feet of resort/casino/retail space,
a 900-room hotel, a 750,000-square-foot convention center,
a 20,000-seat sports and entertainment arena, a PGA-level
golf course, and five parking garages to accommodate approximately
23,000 parking spaces, according to a May 12 meeting attended
by Saugerties and village officials and builder Paul Wilmot.
Wilmot is the son of developer Thomas Wilmot, whose family
business Wilmorite, Inc. has an option on the Winston Farm
and is partnering with the tribe. The casino would attract
some 18,000 visitors daily, effectively doubling the size
of Saugerties, and draw approximately one million gallons
of water daily, the same amount now used by the village
of Saugerties and the Glasco and Malden water districts.
Both Thomas and Paul Wilmot have ignored repeated requests
for interviews with Ulster Publishing, as have Seneca-Cayuga
chief Roy Howard and tribal spokesman Scott Wood.
During Tuesday's panel at the town's fledgling public access
station adjacent to the town offices - the first taping
ever to take place there - Helsmoortel said he has met with
representatives of the tribe and the developers on several
occasions over the past two months. "It has slowed
down right now," he noted, adding that he has been
trying to reach the Seneca-Cayuga chief to let him know
about his position.
Helsmoortel and Yerick insisted the media be invited to
Tuesday's taping. Helsmoortel left one meeting with the
developer and tribal representatives when it turned out
to be much larger than had been originally explained to
him and the press was not there. He had minutes of the meeting
taken and distributed to the media, the reason the media
learned exactly what the tribe and the developer were proposing.
Also on Tuesday's panel were Saugerties attorney Lanny Walter,
chairman of the Winston Farm Alliance and the coordinator
of a new ad hoc group opposing the casino in Saugerties;
and Brian Donoghue, president of the Saugerties Village
Business Association and a partner in The Inquiring Mind
Bookstore. Chief Howard and Thomas Wilmot had been invited
to participate. Howard did not respond and Wilmot told Mellor
he would be willing to discuss the casino sometime in the
future.
"[A casino] will overwhelm us, suck money out of the
community and probably reverse the development that has
been taking place in our community and our town," said
Walter, whose anti-casino group has scheduled a public meeting
on the issue at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, May 31 at the Saugerties
Senior Citizens Center. The group is also planning a lobbying
day on June 7 in Albany. "We are going to try to be
very visible so our governor and our [state] legislature
know we don't want this."
WILL
LOCAL OPPOSITION EVEN MATTER?
Meanwhile, the group has been meeting informally to establish
committees and contact legal experts on tribal-run casinos
to determine what can be done to thwart the project. New
York state senator John Bonacic, R-Mount Hope, who represents
Saugerties, said last week that when governor George Pataki
releases his much anticipated legislation in the coming
weeks to settle land claims with five Indian tribes - including
the Seneca-Cayugas - in return for casinos, it will stipulate
that a casino can only be built with the approval of the
county legislature in the host county. If the governor's
legislation does not include such a condition, Bonacic said
he would insist on an amendment to ensure local control.
According to Bonacic, Pataki has agreed to the provision.
Such a provision could be critical for those opposed to
the casino. In interviews, the federal Bureau of Indian
affairs and acknowledged legal experts on Indian-run casinos
have agreed that if the Seneca-Cayugas agree to accept land
where they have never resided as a settlement for their
claim, it would enable them to circumvent a section in the
federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act that stipulates a community's
position must be considered.
Regardless of the contents of Pataki's forthcoming legislation,
some casino opponents are concerned that developers like
Thomas Wilmot, who back Indian tribes in exchange for a
healthy cut of the profits, make for formidable adversaries
because they are so well-funded. According to national business
publications, Wilmot is currently in the process of selling
his mall-development company, Wilmorite, Inc., for $2.3
billion, a sum that is believed to represent just a portion
of his vast wealth.
"What's scary is I don't know if we can stop it because
we are up against a lot of money and the potential to make
a lot of money, which is what is driving this," said
Thornton, who believes a casino "is not the answer
to economic development in the town of Saugerties."
Thornton has contacted the New York State Association of
Towns, which gave her the names of several attorneys specializing
in tribal casino-related issues. She is planning to organize
a workshop with some of these experts and town and village
officials "to see what we are dealing with in regard
to sovereignty so we can understand Native American land
claim rights." Added Thornton, "We are just coming
off a reval. The community has been very vocal about taxes
and here we would have a property taken off the tax rolls."
Pataki withdrew legislation in mid-April authorizing five
casinos in Ulster and Sullivan counties to settle land claims
with the Seneca-Cayugas; the Wisconsin Oneidas; the Stockbridge-Munsees
of Wisconsin (whose claim reportedly involves less than
an acre of land); the landless Cayuga Nation of New York;
and the Akwesasne Mohawks, whose land borders the Canadian
provinces of Ontario and Quebec as well as New York State.
Pataki spokesman Todd Alhart said that the state needed
to revise the agreements in light of a March 29 U.S. Supreme
Court ruling, which held that the New York Oneidas could
not purchase property and operate it as tax-exempt holdings
without going through the federal land-to-trust process.
The governor is expected to resubmit the revised legislation
to the state assembly and senate in time for action before
the end of the current session in late June.
Some local officials are as concerned about the siting of
a casino in a neighboring town, which would have traffic
and other impacts on their community without any of the
financial benefits, as they are about having a gaming operation
within their boundaries. The New York Oneidas, who are now
seeking trust status for their Turning Stone casino near
Syracuse as a result of the March 29 U.S. Supreme Court
ruling, are believed to be the tribe that has an option
on the former IBM property in Lake Katrine. Town of Ulster
supervisor Fred Wadnola (R-C) said the current owner of
the property will not divulge the name of the tribe due
to a confidentiality clause in the three-year contract.
"We have to look at this more from a planning perspective,"
said Saugerties councilman Costello. "We may be getting
all the impacts without the revenue and that is almost scarier."
Costello said he will ask Helsmoortel to reflect the town's
concerns about casinos in neighboring towns in his resolution.
Several weeks ago, the Woodstock town board passed a resolution
opposing Class III casinos anywhere in New York state.
At Tuesday's taping session, Donoghue said the Saugerties
Village Business Association hasn't taken a stand on the
casino proposal yet although he expects it to vote on the
matter in the coming weeks. But he noted group members are
concerned about what the community can do to alleviate the
impact from a casino.
A
TALE OF ANOTHER CASINO TOWN
According to Tribal Nation (www.tribalnation.com), a union-based
organization in Connecticut opposed to further casinos in
the state, "The Southeastern Connecticut region has
experienced substantial economic growth over the last decade
due in part to the development of Foxwoods Resort Casino
and Mohegan Sun Casino. This growth, however, has imposed
profound impacts on the towns in the region. Impacts include
... 24-hour-per-day traffic increases, resulting in the
need for additional traffic control and highway management;
increased number of motor vehicle accidents, requiring additional
motor vehicle enforcement; increased DWI incidents, which
occur at a frequency higher than anywhere else in the state;
and the need for more emergency medical services. These
impacts not only affect the quality of life in our towns,
but they place significant additional fiscal burdens on
the towns as well," states the website, which notes
that host communities in the region such as Ledyard with
a population of 15,000 residents (Saugerties has just under
20,000 residents) are not being fully compensated for their
casino-related costs.
In 2000, the quantifiable costs to the town of Ledyard resulting
from hosting the Foxwoods Casino totaled $2.22 million,
according to Tribal Nation. This figure included: $1.2 million
for roads and bridges as well as future such improvements
that would be needed; more than $336,000 for crime-related
costs; and some $261,000 to deal with public safety and
traffic impacts. In 2000-2001, the Foxwoods and Mohegan
Sun casinos paid $335 million to the state of which $135
million was allocated to Connecticut municipalities. Ledyard,
a host town of Foxwoods Casino, received $698,000 despite
its casino-related costs.
Donoghue is also the director of mental health for the municipality
of Catskill. Are mental health impacts as a result of the
proposed casino in Saugerties a concern for him? "Absolutely,"
he said. "The [casino] issue is so huge it would transform
the town ... If we can't mitigate the negative effects,
we shouldn't allow it ... I think the state and the county
are both using this as a way to make up for their fiscal
mismanagement."
One issue that clearly concerned all of the panel members
at Tuesday's session was that of the impact a casino would
have on the Saugerties Central School District. In the community
surrounding the Foxwoods Casino, the number of children
entering the school who use English as a second language
has necessitated the hiring of new multi-lingual teachers
at a significant cost to the district, according to Helsmoortel.
"The [school district and municipality] have re-opened
negotiations with the tribe but it is not going well,"
said the supervisor, who has been in contact with the school
superintendent in the Connecticut district. "I think
we are risking our future."
"This casino is like a leech," said Walter. "It
is going to suck money out of our community and our surrounding
communities. No amount of money can buy our quality of life."
TIMING
IS KEY
Yerick is uncertain when he will submit his resolution to
the village board opposing the casino. Helsmoortel intends
to do so at the town board's June 8 meeting. "The state
has no definite plan and the tribe and the builder haven't
gotten together with a contract," said the supervisor.
"I think our timing could be perfect since a decision
hasn't been made yet."
|
AREA
NEWSPAPER
CONTACT INFORMATION
ULSTER/ DUTCHESS
Poughkeepsie
Journal
PO Box 1231
Poughkeepsie, NY 12602
(845) 454-2000
For an
on line letter to the editor. Fill out this
form
Daily
Freeman
79 Hurley Avenue Kingston, NY 12401
Phone 331-5000 email your letter (SUBJECT : Letters to the
editor) publisher@freemanonline.com
FAX your letter 338-0672
ULSTER
COUNTY
Saugerties
Times
Monday deadline
P.O.Box
Phone:334- 8200
FAX your letter 334-8202
saugertiestimes@ulsterpublishing
(Attention Erica Freudenberger, editor)
P.O.Box 3329
Kingston, NY 12402
Woodstock
Times
Monday deadline
P.O.Box
Phone:334- 8200
FAX 334-8202
saugertiestimes@ulsterpublishing
(Attention Brian Hollander, editor)
P.O.Box 3329
Kingston, NY 12402 Saugerties
Post Star
141 Ulster Avenue
Saugerties, NY 12477 Phone
246-4985
FAX 246-5108 poststar@hvc.rr.com
ALBANY
Albany
Times Union
Times Union
90 State Street
Albany, NY 12207
(518) 454-5091
For an
on line letter to the editor. Fill out this
form
COLUMBIA
COUNTY
The Independent
Indenews
(online)
P.O. Box 360
Hillsdale, NY 12529
Phone (518) 325-4400
FAX (518) 325-4497
Parry Teasdale, editor
letters to editor require form through website
***NOTE:
Our websites make an effort
to glean info for our readers from local papers. This is
no way a substitute for subscribing or picking up a local
paper. We gratefully acknowledge the efforts local newspapers
and publications make to our community
|